National InvoiceFactoring

Guide

How to Compare Factoring Quotes Side by Side

A practical method for normalizing two factoring quotes onto the same basis — fee increments, advance rates, fixed charges and exit costs — so you can see which one is actually cheaper.

Updated · 5 min read

Quick answer

Two factoring quotes at the same headline rate can differ by tens of thousands of dollars a year, because the rate is only one input. Restate both offers as total dollars of cost over twelve months, using your own volume and your own average days-to-pay, with every fixed charge annualized and each funder's own day-counting rule applied. The cheaper quote is usually not the one with the lower percentage on the cover page.

Key takeaways

  • A discount rate means nothing until you know whether it is prorated daily, charged in 15-day blocks, or charged a full period at a time.
  • Normalize both quotes to dollars per year on your real volume and your real days-to-pay before converting anything back to a percentage.
  • Fixed charges — minimums, lockbox, wires, due diligence, filing fees — only become visible when you annualize them.
  • A higher advance rate improves cash timing, not price; value the two separately instead of trading one against the other.
  • Price the exit at the same time you price the entry, because the cost of leaving is part of what you are agreeing to.
Finance professional reviewing a business receivables ledger

Why do two quotes at the same rate cost different amounts?

A factoring quote is a bundle of terms wearing a single number. The discount rate on the cover page tells you the price of one 30-day period of financing, and nothing at all about how many periods you will be charged, what happens on the days in between, or what sits outside the rate entirely. Change only the increment rule — daily proration against full 30-day blocks — and the same 1.5% resolves to 2.1% or 3% of face value on the same invoice, paid by the same customer, on the same day.

Then come the charges that never appear as a percentage: a monthly minimum that bills you for volume you did not use, a wire fee on every funding event, a lockbox maintenance charge, a filing and due diligence fee at onboarding, an aging surcharge once an invoice passes a threshold, and a termination clause that prices your exit. None of these are hidden in any sinister sense — they sit in the fee schedule — but they are quoted in dollars while the rate is quoted in percent, and the two never get added together unless you do it yourself.

What has to be on the table before you can compare anything?

You cannot normalize a quote you have only half received. Before any comparison, ask every funder on your shortlist for the same written package, in the same format, and treat a refusal as information. A term sheet that lists one percentage and a signature line is incomplete, not simple. The goal is to reduce each offer to a set of numbers you can put in one spreadsheet without guessing at the gaps.

Ask for it as a written exhibit rather than a verbal summary on a call. Sales conversations compress detail, and the detail is where the price lives. If a funder cannot produce the complete schedule before you sign, you are being asked to agree to terms you have not read, which is a decision in itself.

  • The discount rate and, explicitly, the increment it is charged in — daily, 10-day, 15-day or full 30-day periods
  • The advance rate, and whether it is uniform or varies by customer, invoice age or industry
  • The complete fee schedule in dollars: application, due diligence, UCC filing and search, wire, ACH, lockbox, account maintenance, portal access
  • The monthly minimum, expressed both as volume and as dollars of fees, and what happens in a month you miss it
  • The aging policy: the day a surcharge starts, the rate it adds, and the day an unpaid invoice is charged back to you
  • Whether the facility is recourse or non-recourse, and precisely what the non-recourse protection responds to
  • Term length, the auto-renewal mechanism, the notice window and the early termination charge
  • Whether you must finance the whole ledger, named customers only, or can select invoice by invoice
  • A redacted sample settlement report showing one real invoice from advance through reserve release
  • Who services the account day to day, and who your customers will actually speak to

How do you normalize the rate basis?

Start with your own aging report, not with the terms printed on your invoices. Net 30 is an instruction; day 42 is a fact. Pull the last six to twelve months of settled invoices, calculate the weighted average days from invoice date to cash received, and use that one number for every quote you are comparing. If your ledger splits cleanly — say a group of large buyers settling in 35 days and a long tail at 60 — run the comparison twice rather than averaging two different behaviors into a single misleading figure.

Then apply each funder's own increment rule to that number. Daily proration divides the 30-day rate by thirty and multiplies by actual days outstanding. A 15-day increment rounds up to the next half period. A full 30-day increment charges a complete period the moment an invoice crosses into day 31, which means day 31 and day 60 cost exactly the same. Only after this step are the two percentages describing the same thing, and only then is it meaningful to say that one of them is lower.

What does the side-by-side actually look like?

The table below takes two offers that would both be presented as 1.5% and restates them on one basis: a business financing $250,000 of invoices a month, roughly 25 fundings, with customers paying on day 42. Every line resolves to dollars, because dollars are the only unit the two quotes genuinely share. The percentages at the bottom are derived from the dollars, not the other way around.

Line itemOffer AOffer BEffect over twelve months
Headline discount rate1.5% per 30 days1.5% per 30 daysIdentical — on its own it tells you nothing
Fee incrementProrated dailyFull 30-day periodsAt day 42: 2.1% of face versus 3% of face
Discount fees on $3,000,0002.1% of volume3% of volume$63,000 versus $90,000
Advance rate90%92%B releases about $5,000 more day-one cash per $250,000 financed
Funding transferACH at no chargeWire at $35 per funding$0 versus $10,500 across 300 fundings
Lockbox and account maintenance$150 a month$200 a month$1,800 versus $2,400
Due diligence and filing, one time$750$1,500$750 versus $1,500
Monthly minimumNone$2,500 of fees a monthAt B's effective 3%, it only bites below roughly $83,000 financed in a month
Total first-year cost$65,550$104,4002.19% versus 3.48% of invoiced volume
Two offers, both quoted at 1.5% per 30 days, normalized to $3,000,000 of annual invoiced volume at 42 days to pay.

How much difference does the fee basis really make?

Worked line by line, the gap between those two offers is not a rounding difference or a negotiating margin — it is larger than the entire discount fee on several months of volume. Most of it comes from one sentence in the fee exhibit about how days are counted, and the rest comes from charges that were never expressed as a rate at all.

Two quotes, both at 1.5% per 30 days, on $250,000 of invoices a month ($3,000,000 a year) across 25 fundings a month, with customers paying on day 42.

Offer A fee basisProrated daily: 1.5% divided by 30 is 0.05% a day, times 42 days, is 2.1% of face
Offer A discount fees for the year2.1% of $3,000,000 = $63,000
Offer A transfersACH at no charge on 300 fundings = $0
Offer A lockbox at $150 a month$1,800
Offer A due diligence and filing, one time$750
Offer A total first-year cost$65,550
Offer B fee basisFull 30-day periods: day 42 falls inside the second period, so 1.5% x 2 = 3% of face
Offer B discount fees for the year3% of $3,000,000 = $90,000
Offer B transfersWire at $35 on 300 fundings = $10,500
Offer B lockbox at $200 a month$2,400
Offer B due diligence and filing, one time$1,500
Offer B total first-year cost$104,400

Same headline rate, $38,850 a year apart. Offer A costs 2.19% of invoiced volume; Offer B costs 3.48%. Offer B's higher 92% advance is worth about $5,000 more day-one cash per $250,000 financed, which does not come close to closing a gap that size.

How should you value a higher advance rate?

Advance rate and discount rate answer different questions, and collapsing them into one judgment is the most common comparison error. The advance rate decides how much of the invoice reaches you on day one; the discount rate decides what the financing costs. Our AR programs advance 80% to 95% of invoice value, factoring up to 95%, and freight programs up to 97% of the load — and within those bands a few points of advance is a cash timing question rather than a pricing question. The reserve is not a fee. It comes back to you when your customer pays, less the discount fee and any adjustments.

So price the gap explicitly. Five points of advance on $250,000 a month is $12,500 of cash you wait for rather than lose. If that cash would fund payroll on a contract you would otherwise decline, it is worth paying for. If it would sit in your operating account, it is worth very little, and you should take the cheaper fee structure instead. The one profile where advance rate deserves real weight is a business whose growth is hard-capped by working capital, where every extra point converts into revenue it can presently prove it is turning away.

What else belongs in the comparison besides price?

Once the dollars sit on one basis, the remaining differences are operational, and they are not trivial. A facility that is two-tenths of a point cheaper but funds in three days instead of one, or that routes your customers to a call center treating them as delinquent debtors, can cost you more in commercial goodwill than it saves in fees. These factors resist being put in a spreadsheet, which is exactly why they get dropped from comparisons that should have included them.

  • Funding speed on a normal day and on a day when a document is missing, stated as a cutoff time in your own time zone
  • How invoices are verified — email confirmation, portal acknowledgment or a phone call to your customer, and how that call is scripted
  • Whether notification is disclosed to your customers, and the exact wording of the notice of assignment
  • Credit limits per customer: how they are set, how fast they can be raised, and who approves an exception
  • Dilution handling: how credit memos, short-pays and returns are reconciled against invoices already funded
  • Concentration tolerance, if one customer is a large share of your ledger
  • Reporting: whether you get a live portal, how settlements are presented, and whether the data exports cleanly into your accounting system
  • Who answers when something goes wrong — a named account manager, or a queue

How do you run the final decision?

Work through the quotes in a fixed order so each stage is settled before the next begins. Mixing price, structure and service judgments together is how businesses talk themselves into the offer that was presented best rather than the one that is best.

  1. 1Fix your own inputs first. Write down expected monthly volume, number of fundings a month, weighted average days-to-pay and your seasonal low month. Use the same four numbers for every quote so no funder gets scored against a friendlier assumption.
  2. 2Restate each discount rate at your days-to-pay. Apply each funder's increment rule to your average and convert the result to a percentage of face value. This single step usually reorders the shortlist.
  3. 3Annualize every fixed charge. Twelve months of minimums, lockbox and maintenance, plus per-funding transfers times your funding count, plus one-time onboarding costs. Add them to the discount fees to get one total dollar figure per offer.
  4. 4Stress the minimum against your slow quarter. Divide the monthly fee minimum by your effective fee percentage to find the volume at which it starts costing you money, then check that figure against your worst month last year.
  5. 5Price both exits. Calculate the cost of terminating in month six and at first renewal, including notice periods and any percentage-of-facility charge. A facility you cannot leave is a facility with no competitive pressure on its pricing.
  6. 6Separate the cash question from the cost question. Note the advance rate difference in dollars of working capital, decide what that cash is worth in your business, and only then set it against the cost gap you calculated.
  7. 7Score the operational terms on a fixed list. Use the same checklist for every funder — funding cutoff, verification method, credit limit process, named contact. Judging from memory after the calls simply favors whoever called last.
  8. 8Read the agreement, not the proposal. Ask for the actual contract and fee exhibit before you decide. Where the two documents disagree, the agreement governs, and the gap between them is worth knowing about while you still have leverage.

Get a funding quote in 24 hours

Talk to a National Invoice Factoring specialist at (929) 658-8087 or apply online — no obligation.

Apply now
National Invoice Factoring funding team

Written and reviewed by the National Invoice Factoring funding team — specialists in receivables and trade finance since 2009.

Frequently asked questions

Because the rate is priced per 30-day period but charged in different increments. A funder that prorates daily charges 2.1% of face on an invoice paid at day 42, while a funder charging full 30-day periods charges 3% for the same invoice. Add fixed charges quoted in dollars rather than percent — wires, lockbox, minimums, onboarding — and two offers at the same headline rate can land more than a point of volume apart.

Related articles

Ready to unlock your working capital?

Talk to a funding advisor today. Decisions in as little as 24 hours.

(929) 658-8087
1,569 reviews
IRPR